When People Agree to Change but Nothing Happens

Advice & News| by Joseph A. Brennan

You did everything right. You listened without interrupting. You asked open questions. Your team said yes to the change. And then nothing happened. People reverted to the old way.

Michael, a friend and former colleague who's now a department chair, called me with this exact problem. "I've been practicing everything we talked about," he said. "I hold clear boundaries. I asked people what they thought about the change we need to make. Everyone nodded. We got early wins and celebrated. But then we lost momentum. People went back to how things were. I feel like a failure."

He wasn't failing. What he was describing is so common it has a name: immunity to change.

The Hidden Brake

When someone genuinely agrees to a change but doesn't act on it, the problem isn't what you think. It's not a lack of skill. It's not laziness or deliberate sabotage.

Organizational psychologists Robert Kegan and Lisa Laskow Lahey discovered something counterintuitive: people often hold two opposing commitments simultaneously. They press the gas pedal (genuine commitment to change) while pressing the brake pedal just as hard (a hidden commitment to self-protection). Both forces are real. Both are powerful. And until the brake becomes visible, nothing moves.

Name the Brake

When you sense this pattern -- agreement with no action -- try asking these three questions. Come from genuine curiosity, not critique. Speak slowly. Your tone matters more than your words.

First: "What concerns do you have about this change?"

Listen for what they're actually protecting. People often can't articulate it immediately because they're not fully conscious of it themselves. You might hear hesitation like: "I'm worried about maintaining quality," or "I'm afraid we'll lose what makes us special," or "I don't know if people actually have time for this."

When you hear the hesitation, reflect it back in their own words: "You're concerned we might lose quality in the process. Help me understand what quality looks like to you." This opens space for them to go deeper.

Second: "What feels like it might be lost if we implemented this fully?"

This cuts to the competing commitment. Loss of control. Loss of predictability. Loss of identity. Loss of status. The fear underneath the brake pedal. Once you hear it, say it back to them: "It sounds like you're worried that delegating this means you lose the ability to ensure it's done right. Is that fair?" Let them confirm or clarify.

Third: "What would have to be true for you to feel confident about moving forward?"

This moves them from diagnosis to possibility. It gives them room to articulate what they actually need. Sometimes it's asking for help. Sometimes it's a safety net. Sometimes it's reassurance that the values they're protecting won't disappear.

The Shift From Pressure to Support

Many managers respond to stalled change by turning up the heat. They increase urgency. They threaten consequences. It rarely resolves the underlying problem.

Pressure activates the exact fear that created the competing commitment in the first place. The brake pedal goes down harder. More urgency confirms their deepest worry: this leader doesn't understand. This leader just wants compliance.

Instead, try this: Reflect back what you heard them say. Acknowledge what they're protecting. "It makes sense you want to preserve quality. That's a value we both hold, and it's part of why this team has been so successful."

Then collaborate. "You're worried delegation means lower quality. What would have to be true for you to feel confident delegating? How might we ensure quality while you step back?" Let them find the solutions.

If they're genuinely stuck, offer a small experiment. "What if you delegated one low-stakes task this week? What would you need to feel confident trying this?"

The goal isn't to eliminate their competing commitment. Healthy people need both brakes and accelerators. The goal is to bring it into the open, acknowledge that it's motivated by something that matters, and help them discover they can choose differently.

Before You Ask: Check Yourself

Before you ask someone about their brake pedal, pause and ask yourself: What am I protecting here? What story am I telling about why they're not moving?

You may push for action because you're anxious about timelines. You may oversimplify what someone needs because their complexity feels like resistance. You may be uncomfortable with uncertainty because it stirs up your own fears.

Talk this through with a coach or trusted peer. Uncovering your own competing commitments -- especially around control, urgency, and safety -- is where the real leadership work happens.

That pause is the foundation for truly conscious leadership.

Why This Matters

Oftentimes, people aren't resisting change to be difficult. They resist because something matters to them -- and they haven't yet imagined a future where both that thing and the change can coexist. Your job isn't to make them change. It's to help them see the possibility.

In your next one-on-one with someone who agreed to something but hasn't acted on it, try this: "I notice we talked about [change], but I'm not seeing forward action. Would you be willing to share what might be getting in the way?"

Then listen. Not to fix. Not to convince. Just to understand what they're protecting.

That's when everything shifts.

Disclaimer: HigherEdJobs encourages free discourse and expression of issues while striving for accurate presentation to our audience. A guest opinion serves as an avenue to address and explore important topics, for authors to impart their expertise to our higher education audience and to challenge readers to consider points of view that could be outside of their comfort zone. The viewpoints, beliefs, or opinions expressed in the above piece are those of the author(s) and don't imply endorsement by HigherEdJobs.